Comment to Daniel S about classes of answers to current threats

Daniel’s facebook post about an interview with Tristan Harris and Frank Luntz

The interview

[ 21/September/21 – comment to Daniel S’s Facebook page]

You need to get explicit about answers Daniel.

There are no competitive based solutions with any significant probability of long term survival.

That is simple to say.

Long term survival demands both cooperation and responsibility from all levels classes and instances of agent.

Nothing else has any significant probability of survival. There is far too much over simplification of the irreducibly complex.

Competitive markets are not survivable long term. They have past their point of maximum utility and are now descending steeply into areas of very high risk.

Be straight about that.

We must value liberty, and liberty demands responsibility if it is to survive.
No avoiding that reality.

About Ted Howard NZ

Seems like I might be a cancer survivor. Thinking about the systemic incentives within the world we find ourselves in, and how we might adjust them to provide an environment that supports everyone (no exceptions) with reasonable security, tools, resources and degrees of freedom, and reasonable examples of the natural environment; and that is going to demand responsibility from all of us - see
This entry was posted in Our Future, understanding and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comment and critique welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s