Mark Larkento – Fallacies

While acknowledging a certain level of utility in that description, that definition takes as an assumption that there are only two possible truth values.

What if both true and false are in reality only available in a limited range of contexts, and in many more contexts truth states are defined by sets of probability vectors?
Thus most use of the terms “true” and “false” are examples of distinction category errors within a paradigm set.

What if reality, rather than following causal rules, is really a complex stochastic system constrained only within certain low level probability distributions, that at the macro-scale of human perception deliver approximations to causality that are within the measurement errors of our best tools?

That delivers a rather different context!

About Ted Howard NZ

Seems like I might be a cancer survivor. Thinking about the systemic incentives within the world we find ourselves in, and how we might adjust them to provide an environment that supports everyone (no exceptions) - see www.tedhowardnz.com/money
This entry was posted in Ideas and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

Comment and critique welcome

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s